| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Re Tottenham Hotspur plc ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Re Tottenham Hotspur plc
''Re Tottenham Hotspur plc'' () 1 BCLC 655 is a UK company law case concerning unfair prejudice under s 459 of the Companies Act 1985, now s 994 Companies Act 2006.
==Facts==
In 1993 both Mr Alan Sugar and Mr Terry Venables had a 50-50 interest in Tottenham Hotspur plc. They agreed Mr Sugar would be the chairman and Mr Venables would be the chief executive. Subsequently there was a rights issue. 48% of Tottenham Hotspur plc's shares were held by Amshold Ltd by Mr Sugar. 23% were controlled by Mr Venables through Edennote plc. Mr Sugar had a majority of voting shares. Mr Sugar and Mr Venables fell out. Mr Venables was removed from his position as chief executive through a majority vote on the board of directors. Mr Venables, through Edennote plc began a s 459 petition, on the basis that both had been under agreement from 1991 that he would participate in management, and that Mr Sugar had breached this agreement by taking control of the company. Edennote alleged that it had a legitimate expectation that Mr Venables would participate in the affairs of the company on the basis of shared control even after the rights issue.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Re Tottenham Hotspur plc」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|